Antivirus Performance Comparison

12 Oct Antivirus Performance Comparison

When choosing an antivirus program, it’s important to understand how much of your computer’s resources the program will consume. The most effective programs will have minimal impact on system performance, while still providing excellent protection against malware and viruses.

Most antivirus software vendors publish comprehensive tests in PDF format. The reports offer a brief overview of the protection as well as the performance and usability of each suite. They also contain detailed charts and graphs that show the results of specific test elements. The percentage of malware that is real-world and exposures to reference sets that the program blocks, neutralises or compromises, as well as the number of false positives detecting of benign programs are the most important numbers to look out for.

Avast Free Antivirus had the highest scores for Windows virus detection in tests conducted by AV-Comparatives in June 2023. It also had the highest percentage of success in blocking Mac malware. It also scored highly in the categories of full-scan, passive, and quick-scan.

In the category of paid programs, Bitdefender Total Security had the lowest post-installation background system impact being followed avastantivirusreview.com/learn-about-data-rooms-the-deal-process-to-gain-a-competitive-advantage/ by Kaspersky Total Security and ESET Security Cloud Free. It was the slowest for both full-scans and quick-scans. The program’s low background impact could be because it doesn’t have a default installation on Windows 10 or 11, like the majority of its rivals.

Intego had the lowest impact on system performance for background and full scans, however, it was able to detect every piece of malware. It’s rare to find a company that only focuses on Macs and is an important addition to any security arsenal.